Majority
—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, plea vacated, motion to suppress granted in part and matter remitted to Jefferson County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: In light of a concession by the People at the Huntley hearing that defendant was in custody from approximately 5:30 a.m., the outset of his encounter with law enforcement officials, the suppression court erred in holding that defendant was not in custody until 7:30 a.m. Consequently, statements defendant made between 5:30 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. should have been suppressed, as well as statements he made after 7:30 a.m. Because we cannot say with certainty that the erroneous suppression ruling played no part in defendant’s decision to plead guilty, the plea must be vacated (see, People v Coles, 62 NY2d 908 , 910; People v Harris, 48 NY2d 208 , 215; People v Grant, 45 NY2d 366 , 379-380).
The suppression court properly concluded that defendant’s statement to Correction Officer Storey was spontaneous because Storey’s question concerning defendant’s physical condition was not one that would be reasonably contemplated to elicit an incriminating response (see, People v Rivers, 56 NY2d
By entering a plea of guilty, defendant waived his right to challenge on appeal the racial composition of the prospective jury pool (see, People v Green, 75 NY2d 902 , cert denied 498 US 860 ). In light of the reversal herein, it is unnecessary to reach the remaining issues raised by defendant. (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J.—Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Coles 62 NY2d 908 at 910 p. 998
- People v. Harris 48 NY2d 208 at 215 p. 998
- People v. Grant 45 NY2d 366 at 379-380 p. 998
- People v. Lynes 49 NY2d 286 at 294-295 p. 999
- People v. Harris 57 NY2d 335 p. 999
- Smith v. Mississippi 460 US 1047 p. 999
- People v. Moss 179 AD2d 271 at 274 p. 999
- People v. Green 75 NY2d 902 p. 999