Majority
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion to compel disclosure of the medical records of a non-party developmentally disabled person in defendant’s custody and in denying defendant’s cross motion for a protective order. Defendant validly asserted the physician-patient privilege in response to the discovery demand, and plaintiffs failed to establish that the patient or anyone with authority to act on her behalf had waived it (see, Dillenbeck v Hess, 73 NY2d 278 , 289-290; Schenk v Devall, 205 AD2d 900 ; Schnobrich v Schnobrich, 198 AD2d 850 ). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J.—Discovery.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
Cases cited
- Dillenbeck v. Hess 73 NY2d 278 at 289-290 p. 981
- Schenk v. Devall 205 AD2d 900 p. 981
- Schnobrich v. Schnobrich 198 AD2d 850 p. 981