Majority
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered November 21, 1994, which denied petitioner’s application to stay an underinsured motorist arbitration demanded by respondent, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
There is no merit to petitioner’s argument that the offending vehicle was not underinsured, the reduction in coverage clause upon which it relies being so ''misleading and ambiguous” as to be unenforceable (Matter of United Community Ins. Co. v Mucatel, 127 Misc 2d 1045 , 1046, affd 119 AD2d 1017 , affd 69 NY2d 777 ). Petitioner’s arguments based on the terms of the third-party motorist’s insurance have not been consid
Cases cited
- United Community Insurance v. Mucatel 127 Misc 2d 1045 at 1046 p. 253
- United Community Insurance v. Mucatel 69 NY2d 777 p. 253