Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.) rendered April 28, 1993, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant argues that the present matter should be remitted for resentencing because, at the sentencing proceedings held on April 28, 1993, the court allowed the victim to make a statement as authorized by CPL 380.50 (2) (b). The defendant argues that CPL 380.50 (2) (b) is unconstitutional in that "it serves no useful purpose in the sentencing process”. We disagree.
The psychological impact that the defendant’s crime had on his victim was undoubtedly a proper factor to be considered by the County Court in imposing sentence (see, e.g., People v White, 192 AD2d 736 ). Nothing in the State or Federal Consti
Cases cited
- People v. White 192 AD2d 736 p. 597
- Williams v. New York 337 US 241 p. 598
- People v. Williams 298 NY 803 p. 598
- People v. Jones 195 AD2d 482 p. 598
- People v. Wright 187 AD2d 1016 p. 598
- People v. Lader 114 AD2d 390 p. 598
- Payne v. Tennessee 501 US 808 p. 598
- Booth v. Maryland 482 US 496 p. 598