Majority
Appeal from
Defense counsel was denied Rosario material consisting of a witness’ Grand Jury testimony and a pre-arraignment interview to which defendant was entitled (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 , 289-290). The trial court’s review of the missing Rosario materials was an inadequate substitute for defense counsel’s use thereof under the notions of "fundamental fairness” (People v Banch, 80 NY2d 610 , 615). Thus, the court’s refusal to reopen the suppression hearing was erroneous and as defendant was prejudiced, a de novo hearing is required (supra, at 619). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Rosario 9 NY2d 286 at 289-290 p. 434
- People v. Banch 80 NY2d 610 at 615 p. 434