Majority
In an action to recover damages for libel, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 7, 1963, as denied his motion to strike out as insufficient the three defenses pleaded 'in defendant’s answer. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Under the liberal practice as to pleadings now in effect (Grant Co. v. Uneeda Doll Co., 19 A D 2d 361 , 363; Roberts v. Grandview Dairy, 20 A D 2d 574 ; Foley v. D’Agostino, 21 A D 2d 60 ), the defenses should not be struck out (cf. Civil Rights Law, § 78; Seelman, Law of libel and Slander, par. 172; Fleckenstein v. Friedman, 266 N. Y. 19 , 23; Cafferty v. Southern Tier Pub. Co., 226 N. Y. 87 , 93; Paige v. Westchester County Publishers, 9 A D 2d 772 ; Crane v. New York World Tel. Corp., 308 N. Y. 470 ). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- W. T. Grant Co. v. Uneeda Doll Co. 19 A D 2d 361 at 363 p. 812
- Roberts v. Grandview Dairy, Inc. 20 A D 2d 574 p. 812
- Foley v. D'Agostino 21 A D 2d 60 p. 812
- Fleckenstein v. Freidman 266 N. Y. 19 at 23 p. 812
- Cafferty v. Southern Tier Publishing Co. 226 N. Y. 87 at 93 p. 812
- Crane v. New York World Telegram Corp. 308 N. Y. 470 p. 812