Majority
—Appeal by the defen
Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his pleas of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Stubbs, 110 AD2d 725 ).
The defendant was properly adjudicated a second felony offender on the basis of a prior conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3) (see, People v Caruso, 125 AD2d 403 ). The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Stubbs 110 AD2d 725 p. 779
- People v. Caruso 125 AD2d 403 p. 779
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 779