Majority
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions regarding the prosecutor’s summation are, in part, unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hernandez, 127 AD2d 790 ; People v Reding, 167 AD2d 716 ). In any event, any error was harmless (see, People v Hernandez, supra; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 ).
The defendant’s remaining contentions regarding the court’s charge to the jury, and the alleged admission of hearsay testimony, are also unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 ; People v Bonaparte, 78 NY2d 26 ; People v Autry, 75 NY2d 836 ; People v Fleming, 70 NY2d 947 ; People v Williams, 70 NY2d 946 ) and, in any event, without merit. Altman, J. P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Hernandez 127 AD2d 790 p. 781
- People v. Reding 167 AD2d 716 p. 781
- People v. Crimmins 36 NY2d 230 p. 781
- People v. Udzinski 146 AD2d 245 p. 781
- People v. Bonaparte 78 NY2d 26 p. 781
- People v. Fleming 70 NY2d 947 p. 781
- People v. Williams 70 NY2d 946 p. 781