Majority
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Spain, J.), entered November 17, 1994 in Rensselaer County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition as untimely.
We affirm Supreme Court’s order holding that this CPLR article 78 proceeding, commenced December 30, 1993, was
We reject petitioner’s contention that Supreme Court erred by failing to hold respondents in contempt of court for violating a temporary restraining order directing that the billboard be left in place pending the outcome of this proceeding. Viewing the record as a whole, it cannot be said that Supreme Court acted injudiciously in declining to sanction respondents (see, Educational Reading Aids Corp. v Young, 175 AD2d 152 ; Matter of Nestler v Nestler, 125 AD2d 836 , 837).
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- Educational Reading Aids Corp. v. Young 175 AD2d 152 p. 751
- Nestler v. Nestler 125 AD2d 836 at 837 p. 751