Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered June 5, 1992, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions regarding the prosecutor’s summation and the jury charge are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 ; People v Canty, 60 NY2d 830 ; People v Bonaparte, 78 NY2d 26 ; People v Autry, 75 AD2d 836 ; People v Taik Kwung, 186 AD2d 365 ). In any event, neither the prosecutor’s summation nor the jury charge constituted reversible error (see, People v Diaz, 209 AD2d 632 ; People v Taik Kwung, supra).
The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ). Balletta, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Udzinski 146 AD2d 245 p. 565
- People v. Canty 60 NY2d 830 p. 565
- People v. Bonaparte 78 NY2d 26 p. 565
- Clarke v. Clarke 75 AD2d 836 p. 565
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 565