Majority
Prior to sentencing, the court noted that defendant’s Probation Officer had informed the court that defendant had not regularly reported as required by the bargain. At sentencing, the prosecutor indicated his "understanding” that defendant had failed to report. Defense counsel, however, stated that defendant had reported on each date, as directed by the Probation Officer. The court failed to conduct further inquiry to satisfy itself that defendant had violated that condition of the bargain (see, CPL 400.10 [3]; People v Faulkner, 182 AD2d 1025 , lv dismissed 80 NY2d 830 ; cf., People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702 , 713), and made no finding that defendant violated either condition of the plea bargain, but the court nevertheless imposed a term of imprisonment of 1 to 3 years. Because the court failed
Cases cited
- People v. Faulkner 182 AD2d 1025 p. 1050
- People v. Outley 80 NY2d 702 at 713 p. 1050
- People v. Selikoff 35 NY2d 227 at 241 p. 1051