← Cases

People v. Rodriguez

225 A.D.2d 564 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1996-03-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 564
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto Rodriguez, Appellant.
[639 NYS2d 725]
p. 565
The defendant’s contentions regarding the prosecutor’s summation at the trial under Indictment No. 1060/86 are, in part, unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, all are without merit.

Because the trial court repeatedly recited that the People must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standard of proof (see, People v Talk Kwung, 186 AD2d 365 ).

In view of our determination with respect to the defendant’s judgment of conviction under Indictment No. 1060/86, upon a jury verdict, there is no basis for vacatur of his plea under Indictment No. 807/80 (cf., People v Clark, 45 NY2d 432 ). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cases cited