Majority
p. 627In the Matter of James Morrell, Petitioner, v New York State Racing and Wagering Board, Respondent. [639 NYS2d 730]
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit (cf., Matter of LaChance v Corbisiero, 160 AD2d 293 ). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Hart and Plorio, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Pell v. Board of Education 34 NY2d 222 p. 627
- LaChance v. Corbisiero 160 AD2d 293 p. 627