Majority
p. 646Jessica Boger, Respondent, v Scott Boger, Appellant. [639 NYS2d 936]
Contrary to the defendant husband’s contention, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding counsel fees to the plaintiff wife (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879 ; Brennen v Brennen, 148 AD2d 487 ; Cotton v Cotton, 147 AD2d 436 ; Stern v Stern, 67 AD2d 253 ). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Friedmann, Florio and Mc-Ginity, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete 70 NY2d 879 p. 646
- Brennen v. Brennen 148 AD2d 487 p. 646
- Cotton v. Cotton 147 AD2d 436 p. 646
- Stern v. Stern 67 AD2d 253 p. 646