Majority
Further, it is well settled that the amount of damages to be awarded for personal injuries is primarily a question of fact for the jury (see, Rodriguez v City of New York, 191 AD2d 420 ; Florsz v Ogruk, 184 AD2d 546 ). An award is excessive or inadequate if it deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]). Considering the totality of the plaintiff’s injuries and the period of disability accompanied by pain and suffering, we find that the jury verdict of $150,000 did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5501 [c]; Orris v Orris, 189 AD2d 866 ; Stern v Calzado, . 163 AD2d 299 ).
However, we find that the judgment must be modified since the defendants third-party plaintiffs are not entitled to contribution from the third-party defendant until they have paid the plaintiff an amount in excess of their share of the judgment (see, CPLR 1402; see also, Klinger v Dudley, 41 NY2d 362 , 369; McCabe v Queensboro Farm Prods., 22 NY2d 204 ; Adams v Lindsey, 77 Misc 2d 824 , 826). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Nicastro v. Park 113 AD2d 129 p. 675
- Rice v. Massalone 160 AD2d 861 p. 675
- Sic v. Moran 208 AD2d 607 p. 675
- Rodriguez v. City of New York 191 AD2d 420 p. 675
- Florsz v. Ogruk 184 AD2d 546 p. 675
- Orris v. West 189 AD2d 866 p. 675
- Stern v. Calzado 163 AD2d 299 p. 675
- McCabe v. Queensboro Farm Products, Inc. 22 NY2d 204 p. 675
- Adams v. Lindsay 77 Misc 2d 824 at 826 p. 675