Savone v. Crysteel Manufacturing, Inc. — 225 A.D.2d 757

Majority

p. 757

Bernardino Savone et al., Appellants, v Crysteel Manufacturing, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[639 NYS2d 958]

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the trial court’s charge on the duty to warn apprised the jury of the proper standard to be applied (see, Martin v Hacker, 83 NY2d 1 , 8; Wolfgruber v Upjohn Co., 72 AD2d 59 , 62, affd 52 NY2d 768 ; Opera v Hyva, Inc., 86 AD2d 373 , 377; Rainbow v Elia Bldg. Co., 79 AD2d 287 , affd 56 NY2d 550 ). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cases cited

Martin v. Hacker 83 NY2d 1 N.Y. 1993-11-23 at 8 p. 757
Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co. 72 AD2d 59 N.Y. App. Div. 1979-12-21 at 62 p. 757
Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co. 52 NY2d 768 N.Y. 1980-12-18 p. 757
Opera v. Hyva, Inc. 86 AD2d 373 N.Y. App. Div. 1982-05-14 at 377 p. 757
Rainbow v. Albert Elia Building Co. 79 AD2d 287 N.Y. App. Div. 1981-02-26 p. 757
Rainbow v. Albert Elia Building Co. 56 NY2d 550 N.Y. 1982-03-25 p. 757