Wilk v. Wilk

225 A.D.2d 764 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1996-03-25 English

Contents

Majority

p. 764

Johannes Wilk, Appellant, v Eleanor Wilk, Respondent.

[639 NYS2d 946]

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s cross motion to vacate his default (cf., Otto v Otto, 150 AD2d 57 , 58). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cases cited

Otto v. Otto 150 AD2d 57 N.Y. App. Div. 1989-09-11 at 58 p. 764