Hyperlawhypertext legal database Webber v. City of Dunkirk 226 A.D.2d 1052

← Cases

Webber v. City of Dunkirk

226 A.D.2d 1052 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1996-04-19 Docket Appeal No. 2 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1052
Frederick Webber et al., Respondents-Appellants, v City of Dunkirk, Appellant-Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[642 NYS2d 852]

Order affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Webber v City of Dunkirk ( 226 AD2d 1050 [decided herewith]).

All concur except Lawton and Balio, JJ., who dissent in part and vote to modify in the same dissenting Memorandum as in Webber v City of Dunkirk ( 226 AD2d 1050 , 1051 [decided herewith]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J.—Labor Law.) Present—Denman, P. J., Law-ton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cases cited