Majority
Order of disposi
The Family Court erred in finding appellant had committed acts constituting third-degree criminal possession of a weapon where the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing clearly demonstrated that the ammunition contained in the gun was never tested to determine whether it was live. Thus, the presentment agency failed to prove this requisite element (see, People v Cavines, 70 NY2d 882 , 883, citing People v Shaffer, 66 NY2d 663 , 664). The evidence was, however, sufficient to establish the misdemeanor charge of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, to wit, that appellant possessed a firearm (Penal Law § 265.01 [1]). We reduce appellant’s placement with the Division for Youth to 12 months, the maximum initial period of placement for an act constituting a misdemeanor under Family Court Act § 353.3 (5). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Cavines 70 NY2d 882 at 883 p. 193
- People v. Shaffer 66 NY2d 663 at 664 p. 193