Hyperlawhypertext legal database Goldman v. Weingrad 228 A.D.2d 240

← Cases

Goldman v. Weingrad

228 A.D.2d 240 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1996-06-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 240
Ira J. Goldman, as Assignee of Gamwin Enterprises, Inc., Appellant, v Stephen A. Weingrad et al., Respondents.
[643 NYS2d 343]
p. 241
Defendants submitted documentary evidence establishing that plaintiff would be unable to establish any of the elements of a fraud cause of action (see, Zaref v Berk & Michaels, 192 AD2d 346 , 348). The court’s order imposing sanctions on plaintiffs attorney in this action, for pursuing frivolous litigation satisfied the requirements of 22 NYCRR 130-1.2. We decline to impose a further sanction. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Cases cited