Majority
A party seeking to set aside an arbitration award for alleged bias of an arbitrator must establish his claim by " ' "clear and
Also without merit is petitioner’s argument that the arbitration award should be set aside because it is unable to comprehend how the arbitrators reached the particular dollar amount of the award. "The path of analysis, proof and persuasion by which an arbitrator reaches a conclusion is beyond judicial scrutiny” (Matter of Vermilya [Distin], 157 AD2d 1030 , 1031, lv denied 75 NY2d 710 ). Moreover, the arbitrator "may do justice * * * and [make] an award reflecting the spirit rather than the letter of the agreement” (Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 NY2d 299 , 308).
Petitioner’s claim of fraud in the inducement did not require that the arbitration be stayed. Fraud in the inducement was properly a matter for the arbitrators to decide under the broad arbitration clause contained in the underlying agreements (supra). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Cases cited
- In re the Arbitration between Disston Co. & Aktiebolag 176 AD2d 679 p. 273
- Rose v. J.J. Lowrey & Co. 181 AD2d 418 at 419 p. 273
- In re the Arbitration between Vermilya & Distin 157 AD2d 1030 at 1031 p. 273
- Norris v. Cooper 61 NY2d 299 at 308 p. 273