← Cases

Holman v. Ferdinand

228 A.D.2d 441 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1996-06-03 English

Contents

Majority

p. 441
In the Matter of Tyrone Holman, Petitioner, v Jo Ann Ferdinand, Respondent.
[643 NYS2d 409]

A proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 does not lie to review an order denying the branch of a defendant’s omnibus motion which is to suppress identification testimony (see, CPL 460.10 [1] [a]; Matter of Bull v Owens, 191 AD2d 692 , 693; Matter of Hennessy v Gorman, 58 NY2d 806 , 807). Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cases cited