Hyperlawhypertext legal database C. Pavlou, Inc. v. Gargano 228 A.D.2d 632

← Cases

C. Pavlou, Inc. v. Gargano

228 A.D.2d 632 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1996-06-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 632
C. Pavlou, Inc., Plaintiff, v Gaetano Gargano et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Cardon Brick Corp., Appellant, v Frank Cusimano et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 2.) Gaetano Gargano et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v Carmine Sirico et al., Third-Party DefendantsAppellants. (Action No. 3.)
[644 NYS2d 994]

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in relieving the default of the third-party plaintiffs in responding to the third-party defendants’ notice to admit (see, CPLR 3123, 2005; Gutenplan v Dauman, 154 AD2d 337 ). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.