← Cases

Gozaloff v. Cosgrove

228 A.D.2d 679 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1996-06-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 679
In the Matter of Gerard Gozaloff, Petitioner, v Peter Cosgrove et al., Respondents.
[644 NYS2d 991]

The Hearing Officer’s findings of guilt as to the two specifica

p. 680
tions at issue are supported by substantial evidence (see, CPLR 7803 [4]; see also, Matter of Boyd v Constantine, 81 NY2d 189 , 196, quoting 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 , 180). Moreover, the penalty imposed by the respondents is not " ' "so disproportionate to the offense[s], in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness” ’ ” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 233, quoting Matter of McDermott v Murphy, 15 AD2d 479 , affd 12 NY2d 780 ).

The petitioner’s remaining contention is without merit. Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cases cited