← Cases

Herrington v. Aetna Insurance

228 A.D.2d 680 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1996-06-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 680
In the Matter of Carolyn Herrington, Appellant, v Aetna Insurance Company, Respondent.
[644 NYS2d 992]

The Supreme Court erred in holding that the reduction in coverage clause was enforceable (see, Matter of Paolilli v Aetna Ins. Co., 228 AD2d 683 [decided herewith]). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cases cited