← Cases

People v. Lake

228 A.D.2d 699 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1996-06-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 699
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Lake, Appellant.
[644 NYS2d 974]
p. 700
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Moreover, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (P eople v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cases cited