Majority
—Appeal by
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence is not legally sufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Barrett, 166 AD2d 657 , 658; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 , 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ). Sullivan, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Hart, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Udzinski 146 AD2d 245 at 250 p. 402
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 402
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 402