Glickman v. Kasha — 23 A.D.2d 846

Majority

p. 846

Will Glickman et al., Respondents, v. Lawrence N. Kasha et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Kasha-McKenna Productions, Appellants.

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs affirmed, with $50 costs to respondents. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.; Steuer, J.,. dissents upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to establish that the dramatization rights were available and does establish that the agreement in suit was conditioned upon their being available