Majority
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated March 31, 1995, which granted the motion of the third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint based upon the antisubrogation rule.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The exclusion in the policy for injuries to employees of the "insured” suffered in the course of employment is not applicable to the plaintiff’s accident. The plaintiff was an employee of the Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County (hereinafter BOCES). The policy defines "insured”, in pertinent part, as an organization "designated in the declarations” as an insured. BOCES is not listed as a named insured on the declarations page. Rather, BOCES is listed as a "Co-Insured with regard to general liability” under "special Items”
The antisubrogation rule precludes the appellant from maintaining a third-party action against BOCES (see, North Star Reins. Corp. v Continental Ins. Co., 82 NY2d 281 , 294-295; Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v Austin Powder Co., 68 NY2d 465 ). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- McGurran v. DiCanio Planned Development Corp. 216 AD2d 538 p. 452
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey 66 AD2d 269 at 276 p. 452
- North Star Reinsurance Corp. v. Continental Insurance 82 NY2d 281 at 294-295 p. 452
- Pennsylvania General Insurance v. Austin Powder Co. 68 NY2d 465 p. 452