Majority
Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s current challenge to the validity of his plea of guilty is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Proctor, 79 NY2d 992 ; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662 ; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636 ). In any event, his contention is unequivocally refuted by the record of the plea proceedings (see, e.g., People v Santana, 176 AD2d 360 ), which demonstrates that his plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 ).
The defendant has foreclosed appellate review of his claim that his statutory right to a speedy trial was violated (see, CPL 30.30) by entering a plea of guilty (see, People v Prescott, 66 NY2d 216 , 219-220; People v Howe, 56 NY2d 622 ). Sullivan, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Proctor 79 NY2d 992 p. 529
- People v. Lopez 71 NY2d 662 p. 529
- People v. Pellegrino 60 NY2d 636 p. 529
- People v. Harris 61 NY2d 9 p. 529
- People v. Prescott 66 NY2d 216 at 219-220 p. 529
- People v. Howe 56 NY2d 622 p. 529