Majority
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of assault in the first degree, defendant contends that reversal is required because hearsay testimony of two police officers bolstered the victim’s testimony. We disagree. The testimony of the officers, elicited on redirect examination, was permissible because defense counsel’s cross-examination of the officers opened the door to that testimony (see, People v Johnson, 224 AD2d 635 , lv denied 88 NY2d 849 ). The testimony of one of the officers that, based upon his
We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in permitting one of the officers to testify regarding the oral statements made to him by defendant (see generally, People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673 , 680, cert denied 449 US 1016 ). Contrary to the assertion by defendant, he did not invoke his right to remain silent but agreed to speak to the officer and offered an exculpatory statement. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—Assault, 1st Degree.) Present—Law-ton, J. P., Wesley, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Holt 67 NY2d 819 at 821 p. 846
- People v. Trowbridge 305 NY 471 at 477-478 p. 846
- People v. Stanley 185 AD2d 827 at 828 p. 846
- People v. Mobley 56 NY2d 584 at 585 p. 846
- People v. Savage 50 NY2d 673 at 680 p. 846