← Cases

Laur & Mack Contracting v. DiCienzo

234 A.D.2d 1000 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1996-12-30 Docket Appeal No. 2 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1000
Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v Dino DiCienzo, Sr., Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[652 NYS2d 561]

—Appeal from order insofar as it denied reargument unanimously dismissed and order affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in Laur & Mack Contr. Co. v DiCienzo ([appeal No. 1] — AD2d — [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Rath, Jr., J.—Arbitration.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.