Majority
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting permanent custody of the parties’ children to plaintiff without a hearing, based on defendant’s violation of previous court orders. The best interests of children should be determined only after a full hearing (see, Matter of Dorie v Hyde, 227 AD2d 915 ; Matter of Blake v Blake, 106 AD2d 916 ), and "defiance of a court order is but one factor to be considered when determining the relative fitness of the parties and what custody arrangement is in the child’s best interests” (Wodka v Wodka, 168 AD2d 1000 , 1001; see, Gagliardo v Gagliardo, 151 AD2d 720 ; see also, Daghir v Daghir, 56 NY2d 938 ).
We further conclude that the court erred in awarding child support to plaintiff without having net worth statements and other financial data (see, Tacconi v Tacconi, 197 AD2d 929 ; Falcone v Falcone, 112 AD2d 796 , 797). We therefore remit the matter to Supreme Court for a hearing before a different Justice to determine custody and child support (see, Blake v Blake, supra, at 916-917 ). Pending the hearing, temporary custody of the children shall continue with plaintiff (see, Wodka v Wodka, supra, at 1001 ; Mosesku v Mosesku, 108 AD2d 795 , 796). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Mordue, J.—Custody.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Do-err and Boehm, JJ.
Cases cited
- Dorie v. Hyde 227 AD2d 915 p. 959
- Blake v. Blake 106 AD2d 916 p. 959
- Gagliardo v. Gagliardo 151 AD2d 720 p. 959
- Daghir v. Daghir 56 NY2d 938 p. 959
- Falcone v. Falcone 112 AD2d 796 at 797 p. 959
- Mosesku v. Mosesku 108 AD2d 795 at 796 p. 959