Majority
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Synder, J.), rendered September 28, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of
The trial court acted appropriately after defendant made disruptive comments during the People’s summation, by removing the jurors from the courtroom, questioning the jurors upon their return as to whether they could still deliberate fairly, and issuing detailed instructions to disregard the outburst, instructions that the jury is presumed to have followed (People v Mabre, 166 AD2d 339 , lv denied 77 NY2d 879 ). Contrary to defendant’s contention, there was no need for in camera inquiry of any jurors, because there was no indication that any jurors had become "grossly unqualified” or had engaged in "substantial” misconduct (CPL 270.35 [1]; see, People v Buford, 69 NY2d 290 , 299). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Mabre 166 AD2d 339 p. 318
- People v. Buford 69 NY2d 290 at 299 p. 318