Majority
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Rudolph, J.), dated January 11, 1996, which denied its motion to disqualify the law firm of MacCartney, MacCartney, Kerrigan & MacCartney as attorneys for the plaintiffs.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Although "an attorney must avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest” (Rose Ocko Found, v Liebovitz, 155 AD2d 426 , 427; see, Solow v Grace & Co., 83 NY2d 303 , 308; Cardinal v Golinello, 43 NY2d 288 , 296; Code of Professional Responsibility Canon 9), "a party’s entitlement to be represented in ongoing litigation by counsel of his own choosing is a valued right which should not be abridged absent a clear showing that disqualification is warranted (see, S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp., 69 NY2d 437 ; Matter of Abrams [Anonymous], 62 NY2d 183 )” (Feeley v Midas Props.,
Cases cited
- Rose Ocko Foundation, Inc. v. Liebovitz 155 AD2d 426 at 427 p. 367
- Solow v. W. R. Grace & Co. 83 NY2d 303 at 308 p. 367
- Cardinale v. Golinello 43 NY2d 288 at 296 p. 367
- S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp. 69 NY2d 437 p. 367
- In re Abrams 62 NY2d 183 p. 367
- Feeley v. Midas Properties, Inc. 199 AD2d 238 p. 368
- Schachenmayr v. Town of North Elba Board of Assessors 221 AD2d 884 at 885-886 p. 368