Majority
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find no merit in the contention that the victim’s in-court identification of the defendant should be suppressed. Although the showup identification was overly suggestive, the victim identified the defendant in court based on a sufficiently established independent source (see, People v Ballot, 20 NY2d 600 ).
Contrary to the defendant’s further contention, his prior plea of guilty to attempted robbery in the second degree was a constitutionally obtained predicate conviction and, hence, it served as a proper basis upon which to sentence him as a persistent violent felony offender (see, People v Moore, 71 NY2d 1002 ).
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Ballott 20 NY2d 600 p. 550
- People v. Moore 71 NY2d 1002 p. 550