Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Grajales, J.), rendered May 2, 1995, convicting him of attempted robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant did not preserve for appellate review his present claim that the court’s response to a juror’s oral inquiry
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court did not err in dismissing, sua sponte, a prospective juror who was having great difficulty understanding the court’s questions (see, People v Vargas, 88 NY2d 363 , 379; People v Mitchell, 224 AD2d 316 ; People v Scruggs, 201 AD2d 514 , 515; see also, People v Decker, 157 NY 186 ,190-191; People v Torres, 164 AD2d 923 , 924; People v Little, 57 Misc 2d 1059 , 1061).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Balls 69 NY2d 641 at 642 p. 464
- People v. Stewart 81 NY2d 877 at 878-879 p. 464
- People v. DeRosario 81 NY2d 801 at 803 p. 464
- People v. Agosto 73 NY2d 963 at 967 p. 464
- People v. Austin 199 AD2d 325 at 326 p. 464
- People v. Nevins 178 AD2d 107 at 108 p. 464
- People v. Vargas 88 NY2d 363 at 379 p. 464
- People v. Scruggs 201 AD2d 514 at 515 p. 464
- People v. Decker 157 NY 186 at 190-191 p. 464
- People v. Torres 164 AD2d 923 at 924 p. 464
- People v. Little 57 Misc 2d 1059 at 1061 p. 464