Majority
In an action to recover a real estate commission, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Upon a review of the record, we find that the plaintiff met its burden of establishing personal jurisdiction over the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Skyline Agency v Ambrose Coppotelli, Inc., 117 AD2d 135 , 139). The resolution of issues of credibility by the hearing court, which had the opportunity to observe the witnesses, is entitled to great weight on appeal (see, Laurenzano v Laurenzano, 222 AD2d 560 , 561). Where the evidence presents a "clear choice of polar opposites on the question of service, and the court resolved the conflict on the basis of evidence which was not incredible as a matter of law”, the court’s findings should not be disturbed "in the absence of a fair reason to do so” (McMullen v Arnone, 79 AD2d 496 , 498).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Skyline Agency, Inc. v. Ambrose Coppotelli, Inc. 117 AD2d 135 at 139 p. 482
- Laurenzano v. Laurenzano 222 AD2d 560 at 561 p. 482
- McMullen v. Arnone 79 AD2d 496 at 498 p. 482