Majority
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 26, 1996, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant was employed at an airport as a customer service support agent. When his department was "privatized”, claimant was given the option of accepting a part-time position in another department or of taking advantage of an early retirement program. Claimant chose to retire. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
An individual who chooses to participate in an early retirement incentive program when there is continuing work available to him has not left his employment for good cause (see, Matter of Fisher [Levine], 36 NY2d 146 , 153; Matter of Russo
Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Cases cited
- In re the Claim of Fisher 36 NY2d 146 at 153 p. 652
- In re the Claim of Russo 235 AD2d 895 p. 653