Majority
Amended order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (see, Penal Law § 220.03). Respondent contends that the court erred in summarily denying his motion to suppress cocaine seized from him by the police. We disagree. Respondent was not entitled to a suppression hearing because his motion papers did not contain sworn allegations of fact supporting the conclusion that the police acted unlawfully (see, CPL 710.60 [1]; People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415 ; People v
Cases cited
- People v. Mendoza 82 NY2d 415 p. 942