Hyperlawhypertext legal database Schaffer v. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. 24 A.D.2d 667

← Cases

Schaffer v. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc.

24 A.D.2d 667 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1965-07-08 English

Delivered by Reynolds, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 667
Dolores E. Schaffer, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Frederick H. Schaffer, Deceased, Appellant, v. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Appellant asserts that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting into evidence a report of a blood sample. In this case the oral evidence and the physical facts strongly support the jury’s verdict. While the handling of the specimen here involved leaves much to be desired, in view of the other proof we do not find that in this civil case its admittance amounts to reversible error. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.