← Cases

Diaz v. Artuz

240 A.D.2d 406 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1997-06-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 406
In the Matter of Felix Diaz, Appellant, v Christopher Artuz, Respondent.
[658 NYS2d 1010]

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated November 30, 1995, which denied the petitioner’s application for the issuance of the writ.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386

p. 407
US 738 ; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 ; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 ). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cases cited