Majority
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated June 28, 1996, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In the absence of a statutory or contractual duty to maintain the premises in repair, a landlord’s mere reservation of the right to enter a leased premises to make repairs is insufficient
In addition, the plaintiff did not establish that the landlord retained sufficient control over the leased premises to render it liable for the plaintiff’s injuries (see, Worth Distribs. v Latham, 59 NY2d 231 , supra; Putnam v Stout, 38 NY2d 607 ; Ritto v Goldberg, 27 NY2d 887 ; Hecht v Vanderbilt Assocs., 141 AD2d 696 , 699; cf., Stalter v Prudential Ins. Co., 220 AD2d 577 ). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd. 88 NY2d 628 at 642 p. 528
- Guzman v. Haven Plaza Housing Development Fund Co. 69 NY2d 559 at 565-566 p. 528
- Worth Distributors, Inc. v. Latham 59 NY2d 231 at 238 p. 528
- Aprea v. Carol Management Corp. 190 AD2d 838 p. 528
- Putnam v. Stout 38 NY2d 607 p. 528
- Ritto v. Goldberg 27 NY2d 887 p. 528
- Hecht v. Vanderbilt Associates 141 AD2d 696 at 699 p. 528
- Alter v. Prudential Insurance 220 AD2d 577 p. 528