Majority
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered August 29, 1996, which, after a jury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $131,548, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The verdict is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Martin v McLaughlin, 162 AD2d 181 , 184) and we decline to disturb it. It was for the jury to determine what weight, if any, should be given the very limited testimony of the police witness (see, Klein v Benrubi, 60 AD2d 548 , 548-549). We also decline to reduce the award since it does not deviate materially from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances (see, CPLR 5501 [c]). We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Rubin, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.