People v. Turner

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the trial court did not err in curtailing his cross-examination of a police officer who testified for the prosecution (see, People v Almeida, 159 AD2d 508 , 509).

However, as the People correctly concede, the defendant’s conviction on the charge of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree must be vacated and the count of the indictment charging that crime must be dismissed, as it is a lesser-included offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (see, People v Zapata, 235 AD2d 446 ; People v McCray, 204 AD2d 490 ; CPL 300.40 [3] [b]).

The sentence imposed on the remaining count was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ). Miller, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.