Majority
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.), entered on or about September 29, 1996, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the causes of action for libel and denied plaintiffs’ applications for injunctive relief and to hold defendants in contempt for violating a temporary restraining order, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the motion court’s findings that the libel causes of action were not viable because defendants’ state
Denial of plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief was necessitated by the dismissal of their libel causes of action. The denial of plaintiffs’ application to hold defendants in contempt was correct and no hearing was required in view of defendants’ unchallenged demonstration that any violation of the temporary restraining order was neither knowing nor willful (see, Coronet Capital Co. v Spodek, 202 AD2d 20 , 29). Concur— Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Cases cited
- Moyle v. Franz 293 NY 842 p. 193
- Liberman v. Gelstein 80 NY2d 429 at 437-438 p. 193
- Foster v. Churchill 87 NY2d 744 at 751-752 p. 193
- Coronet Capital Co. v. Spodek 202 AD2d 20 at 29 p. 193