← Cases

Zeilnhofer v. Marcinko

245 A.D.2d 1070 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1997-12-31 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1070
Chong Zeilnhofer et al., Respondents, v Jolene Marcinko et al., Appellants.
[666 NYS2d 77]

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that Chong Zeilnhofer (plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, DePetres v Kaiser, 244 AD2d 851 ; Nigro v Penree, 238 AD2d 908 ; Thomas v Hulslander, 233 AD2d 567 ). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Callahan and Fallon, JJ. '

Cases cited

Statutes and regulations cited