← Cases

Juszczak v. Noco Motor Fuels, Inc.

245 A.D.2d 1093 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1997-12-31 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1093
Henry Juszczak et al., Respondents, v Noco Motor Fuels, Inc., Appellant.
[666 NYS2d 88]

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The proof submitted in support of the motion fails to establish as a matter of law that defendant did not have actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition allegedly existing in the area of the gasoline pumps where plaintiff Henry Juszczak fell (see, Morgan v Genrich, 239 AD2d 919 ; Panzarella v Multiple Parking Servs. [appeal No. 1], 238 AD2d 907 ; Keeton v Cardinal O’Hara High School, 233 AD2d 839 ). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, No-taro, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Cases cited