← Cases

In re Lenny V.

247 A.D.2d 919 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1998-02-04 Docket Appeal No. 2 English

Judges Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Contents

Majority

p. 919
In the Matter of Lenny V., Appellant. Chautauqua County Attorney, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[668 NYS2d 535]

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Based upon respondent’s history of antisocial behavior, truancy and inadequate parental supervision, Family Court properly exercised its discretion in determining that placement at a New York State Division for Youth facility was the “least restrictive available alternative” (Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]; see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 ; Matter of Quentin L., 231 AD2d 890 ; Matter of Edward V., 204 AD2d 1060 ). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J. — Violation of Probation.)

Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Cases cited