Majority
—Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: The determination that petitioner violated certain prison disciplinary rules was based upon information supplied by confidential informants who did not appear. at the disciplinary hearing and who were not interviewed by the Hearing Officer. The confidential testimony of the correction officer who spoke to the informants was not sufficiently specific and detailed to enable the Hearing Officer to conduct an independent assessment of the credibility of the informants (see, Matter of Abdur-Raheem v Mann, 85 NY2d 113 , 122-123; Matter of Huggins v Coughlin, 184 AD2d 823 ; Matter of Wynter v Jones, 135 AD2d 1032 , 1033). Without the informants’ infor
Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
Cases cited
- Abdur-Raheem v. Mann 85 NY2d 113 at 122-123 p. 1001
- Huggins v. Coughlin 184 AD2d 823 p. 1001
- Wynter v. Jones 135 AD2d 1032 at 1033 p. 1001
- People ex rel. Vega v. Smith 66 NY2d 130 at 139 p. 1002